ФЕНОМЕН БЛИЗЬКОСТІ В СУЧАСНІЙ ПСИХОЛОГІЇ

Authors

  • O.I. KHIL аспірантка, Інститут соціальної та політичної психології НАПН України, м. Київ

Keywords:

intimate experience, intimate motivation, types of intimacy, self-disclosure, empathy, alienation-intimacy-dependence

Abstract

In the article we have underlined the basic approaches to the study of intimacy, the classification of its types and the conditions of intimate experience. Intimacy has been considered as a personal or interpersonal phenomenon. There is a correlation between the level and frequency of personal intimate experiences and individual psychological characteristics and attitude towards intimacy.

 

Author Biography

O.I. KHIL , аспірантка, Інститут соціальної та політичної психології НАПН України, м. Київ

 

 

References

1. Burman, B., Margolin, G., & John, R. S. America’s angriest home videos: Behavioral contingencies observed in home reenactments of marital conflict// Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1993, №61.- c.28-39

2. Cohen S, Hoberman H.M. Positive events and social support as buffers of life change stress// Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1983, №13.- c.99-125

3. Giddens, A. The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies// Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.

4. Jamieson, L. “Intimacy Transformed? A Critical Look at the ‘Pure Relationship”// Sociology, 1999, №33.- c.477-494.

5. Levinger, G., Raush H.L. Close Relationships: Perspectives on the Meaning of Intimacy. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press, 1977.

6. Mashek D., Aaron A. Handbook of Closeness and Intimacy// Psychology Press, 2004 -464c.

7. Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? //Psychological Bulletin, 2000, №126.- c. 247-259.

8. Prager, K. The Psychology Of Intimacy // Guilford Press, 1998. – 367c.

9. Reis, H. T., Senchak, M., Solomon, B. Sex Differences in the Intimacy of Social Interaction: Further Examination of Potential Explanations// Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1985, №48.- c. 1204-1217

10. Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. E. The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology// New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991.

11. Schaefer, M.T. and Olson, D.H. Assessing Intimacy: The PAIR inventory// Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 1981, №7.- c. 47-60.

12. Waring, E.M. Enhancing Marital Intimacy Through Facilitating Cognitive Self Disclosure //Routledge; First Edition, 1987 – 246 c.

13. Weingarten, K. The Discourses of Intimacy: Adding a Social Constructionist and Feminist View// Family Process, 1991, №30.- c. 285-305.

14. Wynne, L. and Wynne, A. The Quest for Intimacy// Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 1986, Vol. 12, № 4.- c. 383-394.НА РАО. – Ф. 23, д. 30 НА РАО. – Ф. 23, д. 65, 29 л.

Published

2020-03-01

Issue

Section

PSYCHOLOGY OF THE XXI CENTURY: ACHIEVEMENTS AND FUTURE