ВИДИ НАУКОВИХ ДОСЛІДЖЕНЬ: ТЕРМІНОЛОГІЧНИЙ АНАЛІЗ
Keywords:
trasdisciplinary reaserch, multidisciplinary reaserch, crossdisciplinary, interdisciplinary reaserch and transdisciplinary reaserchAbstract
The author has considered the problem of differentiation of the terms “poly-”, “cross-”, “inter-” and “transdisciplinary research” and their functional specificity. Due to terminological analysis the differences in the meaning and a hierarchical development of these concepts from monodisciplinary through poly-, cross-, inter- and transdisciplinary research have been revealed.
References
1. Князева Е.Н. Транисциплинарные стратегиии иследований / Е.Н. Князева // Междисциплинарные исследования в гуманитарных науках. Вестник ТГПУ. – 2011 – № 10 (112) – с. 193-201.
2. Порус В. Н. «Междисциплинарность» как тема философии науки / Владимир Порус //Эпистемология и философия науки. – Москва: Альфа-М, 2013 – №4 – с. 5-14.
3. Besselaar P., Heimeriks G. Disciplinary, Multidisciplinary, Interdisciplinary - Concepts and Indicators / Peter van den Besselaar, Gaston Heimeriks // Paper for the 8th conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics. – Sydney, 2001 – P. 1-9.
4. Collins Sons W. Collins English Dictionary - Complete & Unabridged 10th Edition, 2009 / William Collins //[Electronic resource]. – URL: http://dictionary.reference. com/browse/multidisciplinary. 5. Groppo G. Interdisciplinaritá / G. Groppo // Dizionario di scienze dell’educazione. – Torino: Leumann Elle Di Ci, 1997. – P. 548-550.
6. Haddad L. Mapping Development research among UK organizations and their partners/ L. Haddad, H. Rowsell, C. Gee, J. Lindstrom // Report To The ESRC. – M.: 2006.
7. Hadorn H. Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainable research / H. Hadorn, G. Bradley, D. Pohl, C. Rist. - U.: Ecol Econ, 2006. – P.119–128.
8. Huxley J. Discussion of the social sciences in UNESCO: Its Purpose and its. Philosophy / Julian Huxley. – Paris:UNESCO, 1946. – p. 44-47.
9. Jantsch E. Inter-Disciplinary and TransdisciplinaryUniversity Systems Approach to Education and Innovation / Erich Jantsch. – Policy Sciences, 1970. – P . 403-428.
10. Jantsch E. Towards Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity in Education and Innovation. In Centre for educational research and innovation / Erich Jantsch // Interdisciplinarity. Problems of Teaching and Research inUniversities. – Paris,1972 – pp. 97–121.
11. Kanbur R. Economics, social science and development / R. Kanbur. – World Development, 2002. – P. 477-486.
12. Klein, J. T. Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice / Julie Thompson Klein. – Detroit, 1990. – 329 p.
13. Nicolescu B. The Transdisciplinary Evolution of the University Condition for Sustainable Development [Electronic resource]. – URL: http://cirettransdisciplinarity.org/bulletin/b12c8.php .
14. Secco L. Dall’educabilitá all’educazione / L. Secco. – Verona: Morelli Editore, 1990. – P. 15-22.
15. Tress B. Bridging human and natural sciences in landscape research / B. Tress, G. Tress, H. Décamp, A. Hauteserre. – M.: Landsc. Urban Plann, 2001. – P. 137-141.
2. Порус В. Н. «Междисциплинарность» как тема философии науки / Владимир Порус //Эпистемология и философия науки. – Москва: Альфа-М, 2013 – №4 – с. 5-14.
3. Besselaar P., Heimeriks G. Disciplinary, Multidisciplinary, Interdisciplinary - Concepts and Indicators / Peter van den Besselaar, Gaston Heimeriks // Paper for the 8th conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics. – Sydney, 2001 – P. 1-9.
4. Collins Sons W. Collins English Dictionary - Complete & Unabridged 10th Edition, 2009 / William Collins //[Electronic resource]. – URL: http://dictionary.reference. com/browse/multidisciplinary. 5. Groppo G. Interdisciplinaritá / G. Groppo // Dizionario di scienze dell’educazione. – Torino: Leumann Elle Di Ci, 1997. – P. 548-550.
6. Haddad L. Mapping Development research among UK organizations and their partners/ L. Haddad, H. Rowsell, C. Gee, J. Lindstrom // Report To The ESRC. – M.: 2006.
7. Hadorn H. Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainable research / H. Hadorn, G. Bradley, D. Pohl, C. Rist. - U.: Ecol Econ, 2006. – P.119–128.
8. Huxley J. Discussion of the social sciences in UNESCO: Its Purpose and its. Philosophy / Julian Huxley. – Paris:UNESCO, 1946. – p. 44-47.
9. Jantsch E. Inter-Disciplinary and TransdisciplinaryUniversity Systems Approach to Education and Innovation / Erich Jantsch. – Policy Sciences, 1970. – P . 403-428.
10. Jantsch E. Towards Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity in Education and Innovation. In Centre for educational research and innovation / Erich Jantsch // Interdisciplinarity. Problems of Teaching and Research inUniversities. – Paris,1972 – pp. 97–121.
11. Kanbur R. Economics, social science and development / R. Kanbur. – World Development, 2002. – P. 477-486.
12. Klein, J. T. Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice / Julie Thompson Klein. – Detroit, 1990. – 329 p.
13. Nicolescu B. The Transdisciplinary Evolution of the University Condition for Sustainable Development [Electronic resource]. – URL: http://cirettransdisciplinarity.org/bulletin/b12c8.php .
14. Secco L. Dall’educabilitá all’educazione / L. Secco. – Verona: Morelli Editore, 1990. – P. 15-22.
15. Tress B. Bridging human and natural sciences in landscape research / B. Tress, G. Tress, H. Décamp, A. Hauteserre. – M.: Landsc. Urban Plann, 2001. – P. 137-141.
Downloads
Published
2020-02-26
Issue
Section
PHILOSOPHY OF HUMAN, SOCIETY AND CULTURE: MEASUREMENTS OF THE THIRD MILLENNIUM
License
Copyright (c) 2014 INTERNATIONAL CHELPANOV’ PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PEDAGOGICAL READING
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
