POSSIBILITIES FOR ONLINE SPEAKING PRACTICE IN LANGUAGE EDUCATION : A REVIEW OF POSSIBILITIES

ADRIANA  PRIZEL-KANIA

Автор(и)

ADRIANA PRIZEL-KANIA Jagiellonian University, The Center for Polish Language and Culture in the World, Krakow, Poland

Ключові слова:

speaking, oral production, interaction, ICT tools, language education

Анотація

The paper explores the use of the interactive tools for practicing oral production and interaction in a foreign language created as part of the SpeakApps project, funded by the European Commission within the Lifelong Learning Programme. Its primary goal was to provide holistic ICT-based services and pedagogies for practicing oral competencies online. The paper describes two tools designed to develop oral interaction skills in a foreign language: Tandem and Videochat, as well as a tool for practising oral production (Langblog). The Tandem tool is a content management system that facilitates the distribution of different materials to students engaged in tasks carried out synchronously. Videochat is a videoconferencing and recording tool devised for small-group work. Langblog is a spoken blog with the possibility of recording audio, video or written contributions. The main purpose of the article is to describe the technical potential of these tools from the pedagogical perspective. As a background for the presentation of the products generated by the SpeakApps project it includes a review of the tools and applications available for oral communication (and those most commonly used by language teachers) and an analysis of the data obtained from a survey study involving 640 students of foreign languages. These data provided the starting point for the design of action-oriented activities.

Біографія автора

ADRIANA PRIZEL-KANIA, Jagiellonian University, The Center for Polish Language and Culture in the World, Krakow, Poland

Посилання

1. Appel, C. and Borges, F. (2012), “Task design for L2 oral practice in audioblogs”, The EUROCALL Review. Proceedings of the EUROCALL 2011 Conference, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 13-16.

2. Council of Europe (2001), Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

3. Debski, R. (2000), “Exploring the re-creation of a CALL innovation”, Computer Assisted Language Learning (special edition), Vol. 13, Nos. 4-5, pp. 307-332.

4. Develotte, C., Guichon, N. and Vincent, C. (2010) “The use of the webcam for teaching a foreign language in a desktop videoconferencing environment”, ReCALL, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 293-312.

5. Guichon, N. (2010), “Preparatory study for the design of a desktop videoconferencing platform for synchronous language teaching”, Computer Assisted Language Learning, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 169-182.

6. Harris, M. (1997), “Self-assessment of language learning in formal settings”, ELT Journal, Vol. 51 No. 1, pp. 12-20.

7. Kozma, R. (1994), “Will media influence learning: Reframing the debate”, Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 42 No. 2, pp. 7-19.

8. Nunan, D. (1989), Designing Tasks for Communicative Language Classroom, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

9. Wang, Y. (2006), “Negotiation of Meaning in Desktop VideoconferencingSupported Distance Language Learning”, ReCALL, Vol. 18 No. 01, pp. 122–145.